This medieval attitude still lives today: a person picks a football team, a political party, a gaming console, a mobile operating system, a camera brand or tech, and then he goes around fighting others to prove what he chose is the best - because it feels validating to see others are worse than him or simply made worse choices. He usually produces no photography to back his statements, and that’s because he is likely not a photographer nor he is passionate about photography: he loves to fight for his champion. He enjoys pointing out the fact that bigger sensors have better depth of field / dynamic range / insert here other features.
#Topaz denoise ai ineffective on black and white full#
Usually to full frame, but even APS-C will do, if he is a Fuji fan. The hater is a person that feels the need for denigrating the system, comparing it to other systems he thinks are better. A huge part of the polarised posts and comments about it can be associated with the following profiles: Micro Four Thirds (I’ll refer to it as m43 from now on) was introduced in 2008 as the first mirrorless system and has become a very polarising topic since then. I hope you’ll forgive me if I start this very long post with a quite long introduction! The camera I am going to write about is out of production and will very unlikely get an improved model, as Olympus declared a while ago - and yet I think it is worth writing about it, because this is a good camera - dare I say, a unique one - and because talking about it will let me address some other interesting topics.
0 kommentar(er)
